Diagnosis Before Prescription

A recommendation without a diagnosis is just an opinion. Before I prescribe anything, I find what's actually constraining growth. That's where every engagement starts.

Work With Me →
Michel Fortin speaking at a B2B founders mastermindMichel Fortin speaking at a B2B founders mastermind
The Philosophy

Deck ≠ Diagnosis

The audit that doesn't end with a report.

The Pattern

Most strategic engagements follow the same path: gather information, form opinions, produce a deck, hand it over. The deck describes what's happening. It rarely explains why.

The Difference

My approach starts with a diagnostic instead of a deliverable. Before I prescribe anything, I need to understand the system as it actually operates, not as it was designed or as leadership believes it does.

The Result

When I know what's actually broken, I can build something that fixes it. That's the difference between a 40-slide deck and a revenue architecture that changes the trajectory of the business.

From Diagnosis to Scale

Every engagement follows the same arc. I diagnose the constraint, architect the fix, then run it at scale.


Diagnose with the Growth Gauge
Before I prescribe anything, I find the one constraint capping your growth. This fixed-scope diagnostic maps your revenue system, names the root cause, and hands you a prioritized roadmap. The fee is credited toward the build that follows, so the diagnosis pays for itself.
Architect with the Revenue Renovator
Once the diagnosis names the constraint, I rebuild the system behind it to ensure marketing, sales, and customer success work together, then seal the leaks and tighten the handoffs that quietly drain your pipeline. What you get is an engine that produces growth instead of chasing it.
Scale with Fractional Leadership
When the build is in place, the system still needs an orchestrator. I take the ongoing C-level seat (whether it's as a CMO, CRO, CSO, or CGO) your diagnosis assigns and run growth as it compounds, owning the outcome without the cost, equity, or risk of a full-time hire.
Proprietary Methodology

The IDEAL Framework

IDEAL is the engine inside the Diagnose and Architect work. It's a five-step diagnostic loop that I run on every architecture engagement. It's a strategic data-informed model designed to audit, find, and fix broken revenue systems, and engineer predictable, sustainable growth.

Step 01

Investigate

I map the system as it actually operates, not as it was designed. AI handles competitive data, content gaps, and pattern analysis before the first stakeholder conversation ends.

Step 02

Decide

Most audits stall here. I name the root cause, separate symptoms from the actual constraint, and identify the one lever that, when pulled, would move the most downstream outcomes.

Step 03

Execute

This is where I build the intervention based on what the diagnosis found. It might be content architecture, positioning, handoff between marketing and sales, or the metrics framework a board reviews.

Step 04

Analyze

Did it work? I measure what actually happened against what the diagnosis predicted, and the gap between prediction and outcome becomes a diagnostic signal for the next engagement.

Step 05

Learn

The loop closes here. I update diagnostic templates, revise benchmarks, and feed what worked (and what didn't) into the next Investigate stage so the engine gets sharper with each iteration.

Common Questions

Clarity on how we can transform your revenue engine.