<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
>
<channel>
<title>Messaging Strategy – Michel Fortin</title>
<atom:link href="https://michelfortin.com/tag/messaging-strategy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<link>https://michelfortin.com</link>
<description>Diagnose. Architect. Scale.</description>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 15:54:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
<language>en-US</language>
<sy:updatePeriod>
hourly </sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>
1 </sy:updateFrequency>
<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

<item>
<title>The QUEST Formula: From Skeptic to Buyer in 5 Stages</title>
<link>https://michelfortin.com/quest-formula/</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michel Fortin]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 19:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Frameworks & Models]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Marketing Strategy]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Revenue Growth]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Sales Optimization]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Buyer Journey]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Messaging Strategy]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Revenue Architecture]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://michelfortincom.bigscoots-staging.com/?p=632</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Most buyer journeys break because companies skip stages. QUEST is the diagnostic framework I use to find where the journey falls apart and how to rebuild it.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-group article-summary"><div class="wp-block-group__inner-container is-layout-constrained wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained">
<h2 id="article-summary" class="wp-block-heading">Article Summary</h2>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most buyer journeys break not because the offer is wrong, but because a stage gets skipped. Having the right product isn’t the same as framing the right problem. QUEST is a five-stage framework covering Qualify, Understand, Educate, Stimulate, and Transition that structures the path from skeptical stranger to committed buyer. Originally developed as a copywriting tool, it works equally well as a diagnostic for content funnels, sales conversations, and go-to-market messaging. When revenue stalls, mapping the buyer journey to QUEST usually reveals where the leak is.</p>
</div></div>
<div role="navigation" aria-label="Table of Contents" class="simpletoc wp-block-simpletoc-toc"><h2 class="simpletoc-title">Table of Contents</h2>
<ul class="simpletoc-list">
<li><a href="#article-summary">Article Summary</a>
</li>
<li><a href="#qualify-the-buyer">Qualify: The Buyer</a>
</li>
<li><a href="#understand-the-buyers-situation">Understand: The Buyer’s Situation</a>
</li>
<li><a href="#educate-the-solution-to-the-problem">Educate: The Solution to The Problem</a>
</li>
<li><a href="#stimulate-the-desire-to-solve-it">Stimulate: The Desire to Solve It</a>
</li>
<li><a href="#transition-the-move-to-take-action">Transition: The Move to Take Action</a>
</li>
<li><a href="#quest-in-practice-worked-example">QUEST in Practice (Worked Example)</a>
</li>
<li><a href="#how-i-use-quest-as-a-diagnostic-tool">How I Use QUEST as a Diagnostic Tool</a>
</li>
<li><a href="#a-map-not-a-script">A Map, Not a Script</a>
</li>
<li><a href="#quest-vs-aida-and-whats-different">QUEST vs AIDA And What’s Different</a>
</li>
<li><a href="#the-bottom-line-on-quest">The Bottom Line on QUEST</a>
</li>
<li><a href="#frequently-asked-questions">Frequently Asked Questions</a>
</li></ul></div>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most businesses know how to describe what they do. Far fewer know how to take a prospect from “I’m not sure I need this” to “Where do I sign?”</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That gap is where revenue leaks. And in my experience, the leak almost always traces back to a skipped stage in the buyer journey.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I developed the QUEST formula over decades of building <a href="/revenue-architecture/">revenue systems</a>. It started as a copywriting framework, but it’s proven just as valuable as a diagnostic tool for structuring sales conversations, content funnels, proposals, and go-to-market messaging.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">QUEST stands for Qualify, Understand, Educate, Stimulate, and Transition. Think of it as climbing a mountain. The ascent is where the real work happens. You’re building connection, credibility, and desire. Once you’ve reached the summit, the descent becomes natural. The prospect is with you, and getting to the close is simply a matter of not losing them on the way down.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here’s what each stage looks like in practice, and what breaks when it’s missing.</p>
<figure class="wp-block-table"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><thead><tr><th>Stage</th><th>Purpose</th><th>What You Do</th><th>What Breaks If Skipped</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Q. Qualify</td><td>Make the right prospect feel seen fast</td><td>Open with a question, scenario, or direct statement that resonates with the right buyer and filters out everyone else</td><td>Right-fit prospects drift because they don’t feel recognized, and wrong-fit prospects clog your funnel</td></tr><tr><td>U. Understand</td><td>Earn attention through credible empathy</td><td>Expand the problem, surface hidden costs, name the compounding risk of inaction</td><td>Prospect acknowledges the offer intellectually but feels no pull to act</td></tr><tr><td>E. Educate</td><td>Introduce the solution without the offer</td><td>Present methodology, proof of concept, case studies, and clear differentiation</td><td>Prospect reaches the offer without enough context to evaluate it</td></tr><tr><td>S. Stimulate</td><td>Build desire and build value</td><td>Expand benefits, add social proof, introduce the offer, layer in urgency and risk reversal</td><td>Offer lands without emotional compulsion, so there’s no reason to act now</td></tr><tr><td>T. Transition</td><td>Move from consideration to commitment</td><td>Make one clear next step, summarize the offer, restate the guarantee, address final objections</td><td>Prospect stays in evaluation mode and the decision never happens</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
<h2 id="qualify-the-buyer" class="wp-block-heading">Qualify: The Buyer</h2>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The moment a prospect encounters your message, they’re making a split-second decision: “Is this for me?” The Qualify stage answers that question fast and unambiguously.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">You’re not trying to appeal to everyone. You’re trying to resonate immediately with the right people, and just as importantly, filter out those who aren’t a fit. This can happen through a question they immediately say yes to, a scenario they recognize from their own experience, or a direct statement about who this is for.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Done well, qualification doesn’t feel like a gatekeeper. It feels like a welcome.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In the B2B and expert-led businesses I work with, this stage is almost always underinvested. Teams spend so much energy on features and positioning that they skip the moment of recognition that makes a prospect feel seen. If someone has to work to figure out whether your message applies to them, most won’t bother.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When I audit a company’s messaging and find prospects dropping off early, the Qualify stage is the first place I look. Strong qualification also reinforces the prospect’s identity as a buyer. It doesn’t just say “this is for you.” It says “you’re the kind of person who has this problem and who solves it.”</p>
<h2 id="understand-the-buyers-situation" class="wp-block-heading">Understand: The Buyer’s Situation</h2>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Once you’ve qualified the prospect, you need to earn the right to keep their attention. The way you do that is by demonstrating that you understand their situation with specific, credible depth, not a generic “we know your pain.”</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is where you expand on the problem. You make it more concrete. You surface the costs and consequences they may have normalized, the risks they’re carrying without fully registering, and the compounding effect of inaction.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">You’re not manufacturing urgency. You’re helping them see clearly what’s already true. You can also use this stage to hint at the existence of a solution without revealing it yet, creating a gap that your offer will later fill.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is the stage where empathy does its strategic work. Prospects need to feel understood before they’re willing to be led. If a company skips from qualification to solution too quickly (and most do), the trust goes unbuilt. The result is a prospect who acknowledges the offer intellectually but doesn’t feel compelled to act on it.</p>
<h2 id="educate-the-solution-to-the-problem" class="wp-block-heading">Educate: The Solution to The Problem</h2>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">You’ve qualified the right people and connected with their problem. Now you introduce the solution, but not the price, not the offer, not the ask. Just the solution itself.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Think of this as the summit of the mountain. The prospect has climbed with you through recognition and connection. Now they can see the other side. A solution exists, it’s relevant to their situation, and it’s meaningfully different from what they’ve tried before.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is the stage for methodology, case studies, credentials, and proof of concept. It’s where you establish credibility through evidence, not self-promotion. Why does this approach work? What makes it different? What have others tried that fell short?</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For SaaS and consulting businesses especially, I find this stage often gets rushed or inverted. Teams either bury the education in jargon, or they jump to the offer before the prospect has enough context to evaluate it. Either mistake breaks the journey. The prospect needs to arrive at the offer already convinced the solution is sound.</p>
<h2 id="stimulate-the-desire-to-solve-it" class="wp-block-heading">Stimulate: The Desire to Solve It</h2>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is where the selling happens in earnest. You’ve built the foundation. Now you build the desire.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">You expand on benefits, not features. You make the value concrete, specific, and personal. You introduce the offer and build its value before you reveal the price. You add proof: testimonials, before-and-after results, competitive comparisons, ROI calculations.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is also the stage for urgency and risk reduction. What happens if they don’t act? What guarantee or risk reversal makes the decision easier? What’s included that they might not be expecting?</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One thing worth noting: testimonials and social proof are most effective at this stage, not earlier. Introduced too soon, before the prospect understands the problem and trusts the solution, they feel like pressure rather than validation. Timing matters as much as content.</p>
<h2 id="transition-the-move-to-take-action" class="wp-block-heading">Transition: The Move to Take Action</h2>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The final stage isn’t a close. It’s a transition. You’re moving the prospect from consideration to commitment, from evaluating the offer to experiencing it.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is where you make the next step obvious, easy, and low-risk. Summarize the offer. Restate the guarantee. Address any remaining objections. Give them a single call to action, not five options, not a complicated process. One clear next step.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The best transitions make the prospect feel as though they’ve already made the decision and are simply confirming it. They’re not being sold to. They’re choosing.</p>
<h2 id="quest-in-practice-worked-example" class="wp-block-heading">QUEST in Practice (Worked Example)</h2>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Take a common pattern in B2B SaaS. A homepage leads with “The most powerful collaboration platform for modern teams.” Impressive features, a clean design, a prominent “Start Your Free Trial” button. Traffic is healthy. Trial signups are not.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The problem isn’t the offer. The page skips straight from Educate (describing the solution) to Transition (asking for the signup), with nothing in between to build the climb.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The page never qualifies the reader. “Modern teams” could mean anyone from a two-person startup to a Fortune 500 rollout. A founder skimming the page doesn’t recognize themselves in “modern teams.” Neither does a CIO. Neither does an engineering manager. Everyone feels vaguely addressed, which means no one feels specifically addressed.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The page also skips Understand. The reader never sees their specific situation described with enough precision to feel the cost of their current collaboration friction. Without that felt pressure, the Educate stage (the feature list) has nothing to push against.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Rebuild the page with Qualify at the top, a direct statement naming the buyer and the specific pain they carry, and Understand immediately after, a concrete description of the hidden costs of scattered tooling. The feature section doesn’t need to change. Neither does the offer or the CTA. What changes is the reader’s journey into them. Conversion follows.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Missing a stage doesn’t just weaken the stage after it. It breaks the logic of the whole climb.</p>
<h2 id="how-i-use-quest-as-a-diagnostic-tool" class="wp-block-heading">How I Use QUEST as a Diagnostic Tool</h2>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The framework’s real power isn’t in writing. It’s in diagnosing.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When a company’s funnel is underperforming, the instinct is usually to change the offer or increase the budget. Before doing either, I <a href="/diagnostic-advantage/">map the buyer journey</a> to QUEST and look for the missing stage.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If prospects are dropping off early, the Qualify or Understand stages usually need work. If they’re engaging but not converting, the gap is typically in Stimulate or Transition. Often, the fix isn’t a new offer. It’s a better journey.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I also use QUEST to audit <a href="/content-strategy/">content strategy</a>. Every piece of content a company produces can be mapped to a QUEST stage. Most companies I work with have plenty of Educate-stage content and almost nothing for Qualify or Understand. They’re talking to people who are already evaluating, while ignoring the much larger pool who haven’t yet recognized the problem.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When marketing and sales teams both understand QUEST, handoffs get cleaner, follow-up gets smarter, and the buyer experience becomes more coherent. A prospect who moves from a Qualify-stage piece of content to an Understand-stage sales conversation feels guided, not pitched.</p>
<h2 id="a-map-not-a-script" class="wp-block-heading">A Map, Not a Script</h2>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Every mountain is shaped differently. Some are steep and technical. Others are gradual. Different markets, different products, and different levels of <a href="/oath-formula/">buyer awareness</a> call for different emphases.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A highly aware, solution-ready buyer may need very little Qualify or Understand work before you move to Stimulate. A cold audience encountering your brand for the first time may need a long, patient climb through all five stages before the Transition even begins.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The framework gives you the map. Your understanding of your market and your buyer tells you how to traverse it. What QUEST ensures is that you never skip the climb entirely, that no matter how eager you are to get to the offer, you’ve earned the right to make it.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s the difference between messaging that converts and messaging that merely describes.</p>
<h2 id="quest-vs-aida-and-whats-different" class="wp-block-heading">QUEST vs AIDA And What’s Different</h2>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If you’ve worked in marketing or copywriting, you’ve encountered AIDA: Attention, Interest, Desire, Action. It’s been part of the advertising toolkit since the late 1800s and remains one of the most durable mental models in direct response. It describes the natural progression of a buyer’s mind from noticing a message to acting on it.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">QUEST doesn’t replace AIDA. It extends it. Two structural differences matter.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">First, AIDA begins at Attention, which assumes the reader is already your reader. QUEST begins earlier, at Qualify, which does the work of filtering. Qualify answers “is this for me?” before the rest of the persuasion machinery turns on. In markets where attention is abundant but the right attention is scarce, that first stage separates conversion from noise.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Second, AIDA treats Action as the natural consequence of Desire. In practice, it isn’t. Most underperforming funnels I’ve diagnosed have plenty of Desire and still lose prospects at the final step. QUEST splits the last stretch into Stimulate (building and peaking the desire with proof and offer) and Transition (making the decision itself frictionless). That separation matches how real buying behavior actually unfolds.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Put simply, AIDA describes what happens inside the buyer’s head. QUEST describes what you need to do to guide that journey with intent.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Funnel stages and QUEST aren’t the same thing either.</strong></p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Funnel stages (TOFU, MOFU, BOFU, or Awareness, Consideration, Decision) describe where the buyer sits in their journey. QUEST and AIDA describe what the marketer or seller does at each point. These frameworks get conflated because they all look sequential, but they answer different questions. The funnel asks “how close is this buyer to deciding?” QUEST asks “what do I need to do right now to move them closer?”</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here’s how the three frameworks line up.</p>
<figure class="wp-block-table"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><thead><tr><th>Funnel Stage</th><th>AIDA</th><th>QUEST</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>TOFU (Awareness)</td><td>Attention</td><td>Qualify</td></tr><tr><td>MOFU (Interest/Consideration)</td><td>Interest</td><td>Understand, Educate</td></tr><tr><td>BOFU (Decision/Conversion)</td><td>Desire, Action</td><td>Stimulate, Transition</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The funnel tells you where the buyer is. AIDA tells you what’s happening in their head. QUEST tells you what to do about it.</p>
<h2 id="the-bottom-line-on-quest" class="wp-block-heading">The Bottom Line on QUEST</h2>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most revenue problems aren’t offer problems. They’re journey problems. The offer is fine. The product is sound. What’s broken is the sequence of experiences that gets a prospect from “not sure I need this” to “I’m in.”</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">QUEST gives you two things at once: a structure for building that sequence from scratch, and a diagnostic lens for finding the gap when it’s already broken. When you know which stage is missing, the fix is usually simpler and faster than anyone expects.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">You don’t need a new product. You don’t need a bigger budget. You need the right stage, in the right place, doing the right job.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If your funnel is underperforming and you’re not sure where the leak is, that’s exactly what a <a href="https://michelfortin.com/diagnostic-advantage/">revenue diagnostic</a> is designed to find.</p>
<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>
<h2 id="frequently-asked-questions" class="wp-block-heading">Frequently Asked Questions</h2>
<div class="wp-block-wpseopress-faq-block-v2 is-layout-flow wp-block-wpseopress-faq-block-v2-is-layout-flow">
<details id="what-does-quest-stand-for" class="wp-block-details is-layout-flow wp-block-details-is-layout-flow"><summary>What does QUEST stand for?</summary>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">QUEST stands for Qualify, Understand, Educate, Stimulate, and Transition. It’s a five-stage framework for moving a prospect from initial awareness to a committed decision. Each stage serves a distinct function in the buyer journey, and skipping any one of them creates a gap that prevents the rest of the structure from working.</p>
</details>
<details id="who-created-the-quest-formula" class="wp-block-details is-layout-flow wp-block-details-is-layout-flow"><summary>Who created the QUEST formula?</summary>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I developed the QUEST formula over decades of building revenue systems and copywriting across 200+ industries. It started as a copywriting framework in the direct response world and has since evolved into a diagnostic tool for analyzing any buyer journey, from landing pages to enterprise sales conversations.</p>
</details>
<details id="how-does-quest-differ-from-aida" class="wp-block-details is-layout-flow wp-block-details-is-layout-flow"><summary>How does QUEST differ from AIDA?</summary>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AIDA (Attention, Interest, Desire, Action) has been in the marketer’s toolkit since the late 1800s and describes the buyer’s internal journey. QUEST structures the seller’s external work. It adds Qualify at the front, which filters the right audience before persuasion begins, and it splits the move to commitment into Stimulate and Transition rather than treating Action as automatic. AIDA describes what a buyer goes through. QUEST describes what you need to do to guide them.</p>
</details>
<details id="can-quest-be-used-for-landing-pages-emails-and-sales-conversations" class="wp-block-details is-layout-flow wp-block-details-is-layout-flow"><summary>Can QUEST be used for landing pages, emails, and sales conversations?</summary>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Yes. QUEST works for any format where you’re moving a prospect from awareness to action. Landing pages tend to cover all five stages in a single scroll. Email sequences distribute the stages across multiple messages, with one or two stages per email. Sales conversations compress the same arc into a real-time exchange, with the seller reading where the prospect is and applying the stage that fits. The format changes. The underlying sequence doesn’t.</p>
</details>
<details id="how-do-you-diagnose-a-funnel-using-quest" class="wp-block-details is-layout-flow wp-block-details-is-layout-flow"><summary>How do you diagnose a funnel using QUEST?</summary>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Map the buyer journey stage by stage and look for where prospects drop off. Early drop-off usually points to weakness in Qualify or Understand. Mid-funnel drop-off points to Educate or Stimulate. Late-funnel drop-off points to Transition. The stage where the drop-off happens tells you which piece of messaging or which content asset needs the most work. Most failing funnels aren’t missing an offer. They’re missing a stage.</p>
</details>
<details id="whats-the-difference-between-quest-as-a-writing-formula-and-quest-as-a-diagnostic-tool" class="wp-block-details is-layout-flow wp-block-details-is-layout-flow"><summary>What’s the difference between QUEST as a writing formula and QUEST as a diagnostic tool?</summary>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Used as a writing formula, QUEST is a template for structuring a single piece of content (a landing page, an email, a sales letter) so it moves the reader from awareness to action. Used as a diagnostic tool, QUEST is a lens for auditing an entire buyer journey, identifying which stage is underbuilt or missing, and prioritizing where to invest. Same framework, different scale. Writing is tactical. Diagnosis is strategic.</p>
</details>
<details id="how-do-quest-aida-and-funnel-stages-relate-to-each-other" class="wp-block-details is-layout-flow wp-block-details-is-layout-flow"><summary><strong>How do QUEST, AIDA, and funnel stages relate to each other?</strong></summary>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">They’re complementary frameworks that answer different questions, and they’re often conflated because they all look sequential. Funnel stages — awareness, consideration, decision — describe where a buyer sits in their journey. AIDA describes what’s happening inside the buyer’s mind at each point. QUEST describes what you, as the marketer or seller, need to do to move them forward. The funnel tells you where the buyer is. AIDA tells you what’s happening in their head. QUEST tells you what to do about it. Used together, they give you a complete picture: you know the buyer’s position, their mental state, and your next move.</p>
</details>
<script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"FAQPage","url":"https://michelfortin.com/quest-formula/","@id":"https://michelfortin.com/quest-formula/","mainEntity":[{"@type":"Question","url":"https://michelfortin.com/quest-formula/#what-does-quest-stand-for","name":"What does QUEST stand for?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"<p>QUEST stands for Qualify, Understand, Educate, Stimulate, and Transition. It’s a five-stage framework for moving a prospect from initial awareness to a committed decision. Each stage serves a distinct function in the buyer journey, and skipping any one of them creates a gap that prevents the rest of the structure from working.</p>"}},{"@type":"Question","url":"https://michelfortin.com/quest-formula/#who-created-the-quest-formula","name":"Who created the QUEST formula?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"<p>I developed the QUEST formula over decades of building revenue systems and copywriting across 200+ industries. It started as a copywriting framework in the direct response world and has since evolved into a diagnostic tool for analyzing any buyer journey, from landing pages to enterprise sales conversations.</p>"}},{"@type":"Question","url":"https://michelfortin.com/quest-formula/#how-does-quest-differ-from-aida","name":"How does QUEST differ from AIDA?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"<p>AIDA (Attention, Interest, Desire, Action) has been in the marketer’s toolkit since the late 1800s and describes the buyer’s internal journey. QUEST structures the seller’s external work. It adds Qualify at the front, which filters the right audience before persuasion begins, and it splits the move to commitment into Stimulate and Transition rather than treating Action as automatic. AIDA describes what a buyer goes through. QUEST describes what you need to do to guide them.</p>"}},{"@type":"Question","url":"https://michelfortin.com/quest-formula/#can-quest-be-used-for-landing-pages-emails-and-sales-conversations","name":"Can QUEST be used for landing pages, emails, and sales conversations?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"<p>Yes. QUEST works for any format where you’re moving a prospect from awareness to action. Landing pages tend to cover all five stages in a single scroll. Email sequences distribute the stages across multiple messages, with one or two stages per email. Sales conversations compress the same arc into a real-time exchange, with the seller reading where the prospect is and applying the stage that fits. The format changes. The underlying sequence doesn’t.</p>"}},{"@type":"Question","url":"https://michelfortin.com/quest-formula/#how-do-you-diagnose-a-funnel-using-quest","name":"How do you diagnose a funnel using QUEST?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"<p>Map the buyer journey stage by stage and look for where prospects drop off. Early drop-off usually points to weakness in Qualify or Understand. Mid-funnel drop-off points to Educate or Stimulate. Late-funnel drop-off points to Transition. The stage where the drop-off happens tells you which piece of messaging or which content asset needs the most work. Most failing funnels aren’t missing an offer. They’re missing a stage.</p>"}},{"@type":"Question","url":"https://michelfortin.com/quest-formula/#whats-the-difference-between-quest-as-a-writing-formula-and-quest-as-a-diagnostic-tool","name":"What's the difference between QUEST as a writing formula and QUEST as a diagnostic tool?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"<p>Used as a writing formula, QUEST is a template for structuring a single piece of content (a landing page, an email, a sales letter) so it moves the reader from awareness to action. Used as a diagnostic tool, QUEST is a lens for auditing an entire buyer journey, identifying which stage is underbuilt or missing, and prioritizing where to invest. Same framework, different scale. Writing is tactical. Diagnosis is strategic.</p>"}},{"@type":"Question","url":"https://michelfortin.com/quest-formula/#how-do-quest-aida-and-funnel-stages-relate-to-each-other","name":"How do QUEST, AIDA, and funnel stages relate to each other?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"<p>They're complementary frameworks that answer different questions, and they're often conflated because they all look sequential. Funnel stages — awareness, consideration, decision — describe where a buyer sits in their journey. AIDA describes what's happening inside the buyer's mind at each point. QUEST describes what you, as the marketer or seller, need to do to move them forward. The funnel tells you where the buyer is. AIDA tells you what's happening in their head. QUEST tells you what to do about it. Used together, they give you a complete picture: you know the buyer's position, their mental state, and your next move.</p>"}}]}</script></div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>How the OATH Formula Reveals Whether Your Buyer Is Ready to Act</title>
<link>https://michelfortin.com/oath-formula/</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michel Fortin]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 17:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Frameworks & Models]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Marketing Strategy]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Strategic Planning]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Buyer Awareness]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Messaging Strategy]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Revenue Architecture]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://michelfortincom.bigscoots-staging.com/?p=612</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Most messaging misreads the buyer. OATH reads two things, how aware they are and how willing they are to act, so your message meets them where they are.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-group article-summary"><div class="wp-block-group__inner-container is-layout-constrained wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained">
<h2 id="article-summary" class="wp-block-heading">Article Summary</h2>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most marketing fails not because the offer is weak, but because the message misreads the buyer. OATH reads two things at once, how aware a buyer is of the problem and how willing they are to act on it. The four levels, Oblivious, Apathetic, Thinking, and Hurting, come from combining both. Used as a diagnostic, OATH reveals gaps in content strategy, explains pipeline stalls, and guides the messaging that moves buyers forward, level by level.</p>
</div></div>
<div role="navigation" aria-label="Table of Contents" class="simpletoc wp-block-simpletoc-toc"><h2 class="simpletoc-title">Table of Contents</h2>
<ul class="simpletoc-list">
<li><a href="#article-summary">Article Summary</a>
</li>
<li><a href="#why-most-messaging-misses-the-mark">Why Most Messaging Misses the Mark</a>
</li>
<li><a href="#where-oath-fits-and-the-missing-link">Where OATH Fits, and the Missing Link</a>
</li>
<li><a href="#the-four-levels">The Four Levels</a>
<ul>
<li><a href="#o-is-for-oblivious">O is for Oblivious</a>
</li>
<li><a href="#a-is-for-apathetic">A is for Apathetic</a>
</li>
<li><a href="#t-is-for-thinking">T is for Thinking</a>
</li>
<li><a href="#h-is-for-hurting">H is for Hurting</a>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><a href="#how-to-use-oath-strategically">How to Use OATH Strategically</a>
</li>
<li><a href="#what-this-looks-like-in-practice">What This Looks Like in Practice</a>
</li>
<li><a href="#a-practical-framework-for-revenue-leaders">A Practical Framework for Revenue Leaders</a>
</li>
<li><a href="#oath-doesnt-work-alone">OATH Doesn’t Work Alone</a>
</li>
<li><a href="#the-bottom-line">The Bottom Line</a>
</li>
<li><a href="#frequently-asked-questions">Frequently Asked Questions</a>
</li></ul></div>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most revenue problems aren’t really sales problems. They’re alignment problems.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A prospect visits your website, reads your proposal, sits through your demo. And still they don’t convert. You assume the offer was wrong, the price too high, the timing off. Usually it’s simpler than that, and more fixable. You read the buyer wrong.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I created the OATH formula back in 2003 to solve exactly that. OATH stands for Oblivious, Apathetic, Thinking, and Hurting. Most people treat it as an awareness ladder, four rungs from clueless to ready.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s only half of it.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OATH reads two things at once. How aware a buyer is that they have a problem, and how willing they are to do something about it. Awareness without willingness is just trivia. A market can understand its problem in perfect detail and still sit on its hands.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The name is the reminder. The real question isn’t only how much your market knows. It’s how willing they are to take an oath and act on it. Where a buyer sits on both axes decides how you message them, what content you lead with, and how much persuasion is left to do.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Get it right and your message resonates. Get it wrong and even the best offer falls flat.</p>
<h2 id="why-most-messaging-misses-the-mark" class="wp-block-heading">Why Most Messaging Misses the Mark</h2>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most businesses write for buyers who are aware and willing, the ones ready to buy. They lead with solutions, features, and calls to action, assuming the prospect already understands the problem, agrees it needs fixing, and has narrowed the search to a short list.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s a small slice of your market. Most of your potential buyers are short on one axis or the other. Some don’t recognize the problem yet. Some recognize it but feel no urgency to act. Some are aware, willing, and actively shopping, but haven’t chosen an approach.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If your message doesn’t match where they are on both axes, it doesn’t land. It confuses them, pushes them away, or gets ignored. OATH gives you a diagnostic lens for this. It maps your messaging to the actual state your buyer is in, not the state you wish they were in.</p>
<h2 id="where-oath-fits-and-the-missing-link" class="wp-block-heading">Where OATH Fits, and the Missing Link</h2>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Two older models shaped how marketers think about buyer readiness, and each captured half of it.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AIDA (Attention, Interest, Desire, Action) tracks responsiveness. It follows how engaged a buyer becomes on the way to a decision, from first noticing you to finally acting.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Eugene Schwartz’s five stages of awareness track sophistication. They map how much a market already knows, from unaware of the problem to fully aware of you and your offer. Schwartz built his model around what the buyer knows.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Both are useful, and both leave out the same thing. A buyer can be fully aware of the problem, fully aware of your solution, and engaged with all of it, and still do nothing. Knowing isn’t the same as wanting to act. That gap, between awareness and action, is willingness. It’s the variable neither model isolates, and it’s the one that decides whether a deal actually moves.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OATH adds it. Awareness gets a buyer in the door. Willingness moves them through. Two questions sort any buyer. Do they know they have a problem? And are they willing to do something about it?</p>
<figure class="wp-block-table"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><thead><tr><th>Level</th><th>Aware of the problem?</th><th>Willing to act?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Oblivious</td><td>No</td><td>Not yet possible</td></tr><tr><td>Apathetic</td><td>Yes</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><td>Thinking</td><td>Yes</td><td>Starting to</td></tr><tr><td>Hurting</td><td>Yes</td><td>Yes</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Oblivious buyers are low on awareness, so willingness can’t register yet. Apathetic buyers know and still won’t move. Thinking buyers have crossed into willingness and are acting on it by researching. Hurting buyers are high on both and ready to commit.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s the missing link. Schwartz told you what your market knows. AIDA told you how engaged they are. OATH tells you whether they’re willing to take an oath and act.</p>
<h2 id="the-four-levels" class="wp-block-heading">The Four Levels</h2>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Each level is a different mix of awareness and willingness. That combination, not awareness alone, tells you what to say.</p>
<h3 id="o-is-for-oblivious" class="wp-block-heading">O is for Oblivious</h3>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Low on both axes. Your buyer doesn’t know they have a problem, or doesn’t know it’s solvable. Either way, they’re not looking for you.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Think how often a business owner doesn’t realize their churn is a positioning problem, not a product problem. Or a leadership team doesn’t see that stalled growth is a messaging problem, not a market problem. They’re oblivious, not because they’re uninformed, but because no one has connected the dots for them.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Your job here isn’t to sell. It’s to educate. Surface the problem, name it clearly, and show them what it’s costing. Lead with your solution before they recognize the problem and you’ll create confusion or resistance.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Content for Oblivious buyers is educational and perspective-shifting. Thought leadership, industry data, diagnostic questions, and stories that help them see themselves differently.</p>
<h3 id="a-is-for-apathetic" class="wp-block-heading">A is for Apathetic</h3>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">High awareness, low willingness. Apathetic buyers know the problem exists. They just don’t care enough to do anything about it yet.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is the stage a pure awareness ladder can’t explain, and the most underestimated one. These buyers often know they should address the issue. They’ve probably talked about it internally. But they’ve normalized the pain, resigned themselves to it, or decided the effort of solving it outweighs the payoff.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Your job is to raise the stakes. Make the problem real, concrete, and urgent. What does it cost them to do nothing? What’s the compounding effect of delay? What risk are they carrying by treating this as a back-burner issue?</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is where a strong business case, ROI framing, and competitive context do their best work. You’re not convincing them the problem exists. You’re convincing them it matters enough to move.</p>
<h3 id="t-is-for-thinking" class="wp-block-heading">T is for Thinking</h3>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Awareness is high, and willingness has crossed into action. Thinking buyers accept the problem is real and worth solving. Now they’re researching, comparing, evaluating.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is where most businesses think the sale begins. In some ways it does. It’s also where you lose buyers who feel like everyone is saying the same thing.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Your job here is differentiation. Why your approach over the alternatives? What’s your methodology, your point of view, your track record? What makes your way of solving this meaningfully different, not just marginally better?</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is where clear <a href="https://michelfortin.com/power-positioning-pillars/">positioning</a> pays off. Buyers at this stage are narrowing their options. Make it easy to choose you and hard to justify choosing anyone else.</p>
<h3 id="h-is-for-hurting" class="wp-block-heading">H is for Hurting</h3>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">High on both axes, and ready to act. Hurting buyers have accepted the problem, decided to solve it, and are evaluating specific providers. They’re not researching the category anymore. They’re deciding between you and a handful of alternatives.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At this stage, friction and doubt are your obstacles. A past bad experience makes them skeptical. Unanswered questions about implementation, risk, or fit hold them back. Sometimes the decision itself overwhelms them.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Your job is to remove those obstacles. <a href="https://michelfortin.com/forceps-framework/">Proof</a>, guarantees, case studies, clear next steps, transparent pricing, and honest answers to the hard questions all carry weight here. The desire to solve the problem is already there. Your work is to lower the perceived risk of saying yes.</p>
<h2 id="how-to-use-oath-strategically" class="wp-block-heading">How to Use OATH Strategically</h2>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OATH isn’t just a content planning tool. It’s a revenue diagnostic.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When a pipeline stalls, run it through OATH. Where are prospects entering the conversation? Where are they dropping off? Are you creating enough for buyers who are aware but unwilling, or are you only visible to the few already hurting?</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When a campaign underperforms, ask which level it was written for, and which axis it was trying to move. A thought leadership piece for Oblivious buyers looks nothing like a case study for Thinking buyers. Mixing up the message for the level is one of the most common and expensive content mistakes I see.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When you build a <a href="https://michelfortin.com/content-strategy/">content strategy</a> or a nurture sequence, map each piece to a level. You want assets that move buyers forward on awareness, on willingness, or both. The goal isn’t to serve buyers where they are. It’s to meet them there and advance them.</p>
<h2 id="what-this-looks-like-in-practice" class="wp-block-heading">What This Looks Like in Practice</h2>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A SaaS firm came to me stalled at the same revenue plateau for three years. Good product, capable team, leads coming in. They just weren’t closing.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The OATH diagnostic surfaced the problem in the first two weeks. Their positioning was built for an Apathetic buyer, someone who understood the problem but felt no urgency. Their funnel was built for a Hurting buyer who was ready to buy now: demo requests, pricing pages, hard calls to action.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The two were aimed at different levels. The marketing attracted buyers who weren’t urgent, then the funnel rushed them to decide. They stalled, predictably.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We realigned the messaging to the buyer’s actual state. Raise the stakes first, make the cost of inaction concrete, then move them toward the decision. Same product, same price, same ad spend. Qualified pipeline rose 197% in 90 days.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The fix wasn’t a better offer. It was matching the message to where the buyer actually was.</p>
<h2 id="a-practical-framework-for-revenue-leaders" class="wp-block-heading">A Practical Framework for Revenue Leaders</h2>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If you’re a CMO, CRO, or growth leader, here’s how I’d use OATH operationally.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Audit your content library against the four levels. Most companies are overweight on Thinking and Hurting content and nearly absent for Oblivious and Apathetic buyers. That makes them invisible to most of their market.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Score your inbound leads by level. Where buyers enter your funnel tells you where your marketing is working and where it’s leaving demand on the table.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Align sales and marketing messaging to level, not just persona. A CFO who is oblivious needs something entirely different from a CFO who is hurting, even though they share the same profile.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Use OATH as a shared language between marketing and sales. When both teams know a buyer’s awareness and willingness, handoffs get cleaner, follow-up gets smarter, and deals close faster.</p>
<h2 id="oath-doesnt-work-alone" class="wp-block-heading">OATH Doesn’t Work Alone</h2>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OATH tells you where a buyer is. Two other frameworks tell you what to do about it.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://michelfortin.com/quest-formula/" data-type="post" data-id="632">QUEST handles the sequence</a>. Once OATH gives you a buyer’s level, QUEST (Qualify, Understand, Educate, Stimulate, Transition) structures the conversation that moves them forward. The level decides where you pick them up. An Oblivious buyer starts at Qualify and Understand. A Hurting buyer is already at Stimulate and Transition.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://michelfortin.com/forceps-framework/" data-type="post" data-id="4492">FORCEPS handles the proof</a>. Different levels are convinced by different evidence. Oblivious and Apathetic buyers respond to perceptual and factual proof, the stories and plain facts that reframe how they see the problem. Thinking buyers want evidential and credential proof, the data and qualifications that hold up under comparison. Hurting buyers respond to social, optical, and relational proof, the testimonials and visible results that lower the risk of saying yes.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Read together, the three answer the whole question. OATH tells you where the buyer is. QUEST tells you how to move them. FORCEPS tells you what proof closes the gap.</p>
<h2 id="the-bottom-line" class="wp-block-heading">The Bottom Line</h2>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Your buyers aren’t in the same place. Some don’t know they need you. Some know but won’t move yet. Some are shopping. Some are ready to sign.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One message can’t serve all four. OATH is a simple, durable way to read both how aware your buyers are and how willing they are to act, then build the content and conversations that move them forward.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s not just good marketing. That’s how you build a <a href="https://michelfortin.com/revenue-architecture/">revenue architecture</a> that compounds over time.</p>
<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>
<h2 id="frequently-asked-questions" class="wp-block-heading">Frequently Asked Questions</h2>
<div class="wp-block-wpseopress-faq-block-v2 is-layout-flow wp-block-wpseopress-faq-block-v2-is-layout-flow">
<details id="what-does-oath-stand-for" class="wp-block-details is-layout-flow wp-block-details-is-layout-flow"><summary><strong>What does OATH stand for?</strong></summary>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OATH stands for Oblivious, Apathetic, Thinking, and Hurting. The four levels combine how aware a buyer is of the problem with how willing they are to act on it. Each level needs a different message. What works for a Hurting buyer will confuse or push away an Oblivious one.</p>
</details>
<details id="who-created-the-oath-formula-and-when" class="wp-block-details is-layout-flow wp-block-details-is-layout-flow"><summary><strong>Who created the OATH formula and when?</strong></summary>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Michel Fortin created the OATH formula in 2003 as a diagnostic for reading how aware a buyer is and how willing they are to act. It started in direct response copywriting and now applies across content strategy, revenue architecture, pipeline diagnostics, and sales and marketing alignment.</p>
</details>
<details id="why-do-most-marketing-messages-fail-to-convert" class="wp-block-details is-layout-flow wp-block-details-is-layout-flow"><summary><strong>Why do most marketing messages fail to convert?</strong></summary>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most businesses write messaging aimed at buyers who are already ready to buy — Thinking or Hurting stage. That’s a small fraction of the total addressable market. The majority of potential buyers are Oblivious or Apathetic, and messaging built for late-stage buyers doesn’t reach them. Misaligning message to stage is one of the most common and expensive content mistakes in marketing.</p>
</details>
<details id="how-do-you-use-oath-to-diagnose-a-stalled-pipeline" class="wp-block-details is-layout-flow wp-block-details-is-layout-flow"><summary><strong>How do you use OATH to diagnose a stalled pipeline?</strong></summary>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Map where most prospects are entering the conversation and where they’re dropping off. Early drop-off usually signals weak coverage of Oblivious and Apathetic buyers — the content isn’t meeting them where they are. Mid-funnel stalls often point to undifferentiated Thinking-stage messaging. OATH turns a vague “the pipeline is slow” problem into a specific content or messaging gap you can fix.</p>
</details>
<details id="what-kind-of-content-works-for-each-oath-stage" class="wp-block-details is-layout-flow wp-block-details-is-layout-flow"><summary><strong>What kind of content works for each OATH stage?</strong></summary>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Oblivious buyers need perspective-shifting content that surfaces and names the problem. Apathetic buyers need ROI framing and competitive context that raises the stakes of inaction. Thinking buyers need clear differentiation and a strong point of view. Hurting buyers need proof, case studies, transparent pricing, and answers to the hard questions that reduce the perceived risk of saying yes.</p>
</details>
<script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"FAQPage","url":"https://michelfortin.com/oath-formula/","@id":"https://michelfortin.com/oath-formula/","mainEntity":[{"@type":"Question","url":"https://michelfortin.com/oath-formula/#what-does-oath-stand-for","name":"What does OATH stand for?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"<p>OATH stands for Oblivious, Apathetic, Thinking, and Hurting. The four levels combine how aware a buyer is of the problem with how willing they are to act on it. Each level needs a different message. What works for a Hurting buyer will confuse or push away an Oblivious one.</p>"}},{"@type":"Question","url":"https://michelfortin.com/oath-formula/#who-created-the-oath-formula-and-when","name":"Who created the OATH formula and when?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"<p>Michel Fortin created the OATH formula in 2003 as a diagnostic for reading how aware a buyer is and how willing they are to act. It started in direct response copywriting and now applies across content strategy, revenue architecture, pipeline diagnostics, and sales and marketing alignment.</p>"}},{"@type":"Question","url":"https://michelfortin.com/oath-formula/#why-do-most-marketing-messages-fail-to-convert","name":"Why do most marketing messages fail to convert?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"<p>Most businesses write messaging aimed at buyers who are already ready to buy — Thinking or Hurting stage. That's a small fraction of the total addressable market. The majority of potential buyers are Oblivious or Apathetic, and messaging built for late-stage buyers doesn't reach them. Misaligning message to stage is one of the most common and expensive content mistakes in marketing.</p>"}},{"@type":"Question","url":"https://michelfortin.com/oath-formula/#how-do-you-use-oath-to-diagnose-a-stalled-pipeline","name":"How do you use OATH to diagnose a stalled pipeline?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"<p>Map where most prospects are entering the conversation and where they're dropping off. Early drop-off usually signals weak coverage of Oblivious and Apathetic buyers — the content isn't meeting them where they are. Mid-funnel stalls often point to undifferentiated Thinking-stage messaging. OATH turns a vague \"the pipeline is slow\" problem into a specific content or messaging gap you can fix.</p>"}},{"@type":"Question","url":"https://michelfortin.com/oath-formula/#what-kind-of-content-works-for-each-oath-stage","name":"What kind of content works for each OATH stage?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"<p>Oblivious buyers need perspective-shifting content that surfaces and names the problem. Apathetic buyers need ROI framing and competitive context that raises the stakes of inaction. Thinking buyers need clear differentiation and a strong point of view. Hurting buyers need proof, case studies, transparent pricing, and answers to the hard questions that reduce the perceived risk of saying yes.</p>"}}]}</script></div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>