<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
>
<channel>
<title>FORCEPS – Michel Fortin</title>
<atom:link href="https://michelfortin.com/tag/forceps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<link>https://michelfortin.com</link>
<description>Diagnose. Architect. Scale.</description>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 17:20:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
<language>en-US</language>
<sy:updatePeriod>
hourly </sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>
1 </sy:updateFrequency>
<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

<item>
<title>How I Diagnose a Market Before I Try to Reposition It</title>
<link>https://michelfortin.com/three-lens-diagnostic/</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michel Fortin]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 16:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Frameworks & Models]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Buyer Awareness]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Diagnostic Method]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[FORCEPS]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Fractional CMO]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Marketing Diagnosis]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[OATH Formula]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Positioning Strategy]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Power Positioning]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Proof]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Repositioning]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://michelfortincom.bigscoots-staging.com/?p=11781</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Most repositioning fails because the diagnosis was partial. Here is the three-lens method I run as a fractional CMO (Chief Marketing Officer) before I reposition a market.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-group article-summary"><div class="wp-block-group__inner-container is-layout-constrained wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained">
<h2 id="article-summary" class="wp-block-heading">Article Summary</h2>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Stalled growth is rarely a copy problem. It’s a diagnosis problem. Before repositioning a market, run three lenses in sequence: Power Positioning (what specific place to own), the OATH formula (whether buyers are Oblivious, Apathetic, Thinking, or Hurting), and FORCEPS (which of seven proof types closes the doubt). Any single framework gives a confident but partial read. Stacked in order, they reveal the real gap and prevent endless homepage rewrites that fix nothing.</p>
</div></div>
<div role="navigation" aria-label="Table of Contents" class="simpletoc toc wp-block-simpletoc-toc"><h2 class="simpletoc-title">Table of Contents</h2>
<ul class="simpletoc-list">
<li><a href="#article-summary">Article Summary</a>
</li>
<li><a href="#you-see-but-you-do-not-observe">You See, But You Do Not Observe</a>
</li>
<li><a href="#the-first-lens-is-what-to-position">The First Lens Is What to Position</a>
</li>
<li><a href="#the-second-lens-is-where-the-buyer-actually-stands">The Second Lens Is Where the Buyer Actually Stands</a>
</li>
<li><a href="#the-third-lens-is-what-proof-closes-the-gap">The Third Lens Is What Proof Closes the Gap</a>
</li>
<li><a href="#why-i-run-them-in-that-order">Why I Run Them In That Order</a>
</li>
<li><a href="#this-is-not-only-for-fractional-work">This Is Not Only For Fractional Work</a>
</li>
<li><a href="#diagnose-before-you-produce">Diagnose Before You Produce</a>
</li>
<li><a href="#frequently-asked-questions">Frequently Asked Questions</a>
</li></ul></div>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A SaaS company once told me their problem was the messaging. They had rewritten their homepage four times in a year. Traffic was healthy. The pitch was clear. And they were still parked at the same revenue line they had hit three years earlier.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On the surface, that looks like a copy problem. It almost never is.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When I step into a fractional engagement, the first thing I do is not write. I diagnose. And I have learned the hard way not to trust a single framework to give me the whole read, because one lens on its own will lie to you with total confidence.</p>
<h2 id="you-see-but-you-do-not-observe" class="wp-block-heading">You See, But You Do Not Observe</h2>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That line is Sherlock Holmes, scolding Watson for looking at the same staircase a thousand times without ever counting the steps. A market hands you the same clues it hands everyone else. The edge is reading them in a way your competitors do not.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">So I run three lenses over every market before I touch a word of the messaging. Each lens answers one question, and only one. On its own, each one produces a clean, confident, wrong answer. Stacked together, they produce a read I can actually act on.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Power Positioning tells me what to position. The OATH formula tells me what awareness level I am speaking to. FORCEPS tells me what proof will close the gap. Those are the three steps of the deduction, and the order matters more than people expect.</p>
<h2 id="the-first-lens-is-what-to-position" class="wp-block-heading">The First Lens Is What to Position</h2>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The first question is the one most companies skip. What specific, ownable place should this business occupy in the buyer’s mind?</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is <a href="https://michelfortin.com/power-positioning/">Power Positioning</a>, and it is not a tagline exercise. The market is not a physical space. It is a mental one. The company that wins is rarely the best in the category. It is the one the buyer thinks of first when the need shows up.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When I look through this lens, I am hunting for one gap. The distance between what a company says it is, what its marketing implies it is, and what its buyers actually believe. Those three are almost never aligned, and that gap is where growth quietly stalls.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">With the SaaS firm, the place they could own was clear and narrow. Their messaging blurred it across three adjacent claims, so the market remembered none of them. That was the first clue, but it did not explain the stall on its own.</p>
<h2 id="the-second-lens-is-where-the-buyer-actually-stands" class="wp-block-heading">The Second Lens Is Where the Buyer Actually Stands</h2>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A sharp position aimed at the wrong moment still misses. So the second lens asks where the buyer sits before I decide how to speak to them.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is the <a href="https://michelfortin.com/oath-formula/">OATH formula</a>, which I built back in 2003. It maps four stages of awareness. Oblivious buyers do not know they have the problem. Apathetic buyers know but do not feel the urgency. Thinking buyers are actively comparing options. Hurting buyers are ready to act and just need the friction removed.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Each stage needs a different message. Lead with proof and pricing for an Oblivious buyer and you lose them. Educate a Hurting buyer who already wants to sign and you stall the deal.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Through this lens, the SaaS picture sharpened. Most of their buyers were Apathetic. They understood the problem and felt no pressure to fix it. But the entire funnel was built for Hurting buyers who were ready to buy now. The position was findable. The conversation was aimed at the wrong moment.</p>
<h2 id="the-third-lens-is-what-proof-closes-the-gap" class="wp-block-heading">The Third Lens Is What Proof Closes the Gap</h2>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The third lens assumes the position is right and the awareness level is read correctly, and then asks a harder question. What is the buyer still not convinced of?</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Doubt blocks more decisions than weak offers do. <a href="https://michelfortin.com/forceps-framework/">FORCEPS</a> names the seven kinds of proof a buyer accepts: Factual, Optical, Relational, Credential, Evidential, Perceptual, and Social. The lens tells me which kind is missing at the exact point where the buyer goes quiet.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For an Apathetic buyer, the proof that moves them is rarely a testimonial. It is relational proof. The cost of doing nothing, made concrete enough to feel. Their messaging was built for a buyer who was ready to act, so it never put a number on what standing still was costing every month they waited.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Three lenses, one diagnosis. The position was blurred, the messaging spoke to the wrong awareness stage, and the proof that raises urgency was thin. We realigned the messaging to the buyer’s actual state. Qualified pipeline rose 197% in 90 days, with no change to the product, the price, or the ad spend.</p>
<h2 id="why-i-run-them-in-that-order" class="wp-block-heading">Why I Run Them In That Order</h2>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The sequence is not arbitrary. The place comes first because it sets the destination, and everything downstream exists to deliver a buyer to it. Awareness tells me where that buyer is standing when the trip begins. Proof clears whatever is blocking the road between the two.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Start with proof and you stack evidence for a position the company has not earned yet. Start with awareness and you meet the buyer beautifully, then lead them nowhere.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is also why a single framework is dangerous on its own. Each one is correct about its own slice and silent about the other two. The OATH read on its own would have told me to fix the funnel. True, but incomplete. The positioning read alone would have told me to sharpen the message. Also true, also incomplete. The deduction only holds when all three agree on the same story.</p>
<h2 id="this-is-not-only-for-fractional-work" class="wp-block-heading">This Is Not Only For Fractional Work</h2>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I run this read as a fractional CMO, CRO, or CSO because that is the seat I am usually in. But the method does not belong to the title.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An executive repositioning a business unit runs the same three lenses. So does an expert building authority around a point of view, or a founder deciding what their company should be known for. The common thread is not the role. It is the depth of judgment behind the read. Anyone who has to make a market believe something can pick up these three instruments and use them.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is the part I care about most. The frameworks are not the point. The point is refusing to act on a partial diagnosis, no matter how confident the first clue feels.</p>
<h2 id="diagnose-before-you-produce" class="wp-block-heading">Diagnose Before You Produce</h2>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most teams skip straight to production. They write before they observe, and they end up rewriting the homepage four times in a year while the real problem sits two lenses away.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The three-lens read is slow on the first day and fast for the rest of the engagement, because you stop guessing. You know what to position, who is ready to hear it, and what proof finally makes them believe it.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If your growth has stalled and the messaging fixes are not holding, that is usually the tell. The diagnosis was partial. <a href="https://michelfortin.com/contact">Book a discovery call</a> and we can run the three lenses over your market together.</p>
<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>
<h2 id="frequently-asked-questions" class="wp-block-heading">Frequently Asked Questions</h2>
<div class="wp-block-wpseopress-faq-block-v2 is-layout-flow wp-block-wpseopress-faq-block-v2-is-layout-flow">
<details id="what-is-the-three-lens-diagnostic-method" class="wp-block-details is-layout-flow wp-block-details-is-layout-flow"><summary><strong>What is the three-lens diagnostic method?</strong></summary>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It is the read I run before any repositioning work. Power Positioning identifies the place a company should own. The OATH formula identifies where the buyer sits on the awareness spectrum. FORCEPS identifies which proof is missing. Used together, they catch what any single framework misses.</p>
</details>
<details id="why-not-just-use-one-framework" class="wp-block-details is-layout-flow wp-block-details-is-layout-flow"><summary><strong>Why not just use one framework?</strong></summary>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Each framework is right about its own slice and blind to the other two. A positioning read alone tells you to sharpen the message. An awareness read alone tells you to fix the funnel. Both can be true and still incomplete. The diagnosis only holds when all three point to the same problem.</p>
</details>
<details id="who-is-this-method-for" class="wp-block-details is-layout-flow wp-block-details-is-layout-flow"><summary><strong>Who is this method for?</strong></summary>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Fractional executives, full-time CMOs and CROs, founders, and experts building authority. Anyone responsible for making a market believe something can run the three lenses, regardless of title.</p>
</details>
<script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"FAQPage","url":"https://michelfortin.com/three-lens-diagnostic/","@id":"https://michelfortin.com/three-lens-diagnostic/","mainEntity":[{"@type":"Question","url":"https://michelfortin.com/three-lens-diagnostic/#what-is-the-three-lens-diagnostic-method","name":"What is the three-lens diagnostic method?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"<p>It is the read I run before any repositioning work. Power Positioning identifies the place a company should own. The OATH formula identifies where the buyer sits on the awareness spectrum. FORCEPS identifies which proof is missing. Used together, they catch what any single framework misses.</p>"}},{"@type":"Question","url":"https://michelfortin.com/three-lens-diagnostic/#why-not-just-use-one-framework","name":"Why not just use one framework?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"<p>Each framework is right about its own slice and blind to the other two. A positioning read alone tells you to sharpen the message. An awareness read alone tells you to fix the funnel. Both can be true and still incomplete. The diagnosis only holds when all three point to the same problem.</p>"}},{"@type":"Question","url":"https://michelfortin.com/three-lens-diagnostic/#who-is-this-method-for","name":"Who is this method for?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"<p>Fractional executives, full-time CMOs and CROs, founders, and experts building authority. Anyone responsible for making a market believe something can run the three lenses, regardless of title.</p>"}}]}</script></div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Diagnostic Skill That Separates Strategic Hires from Expensive Ones</title>
<link>https://michelfortin.com/diagnostic-advantage/</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michel Fortin]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 17:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Expert Leadership]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Strategic Planning]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Buyer Awareness]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Diagnostic Strategy]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[FORCEPS]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Market Analysis]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[OATH]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Power Positioning]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Proof Stack]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Sherlocking]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://michelfortincom.bigscoots-staging.com/?p=5248</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Most consultants start with solutions. The best fractional executives start by reading the business through three diagnostic lenses before they prescribe anything.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-group article-summary"><div class="wp-block-group__inner-container is-layout-constrained wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained">
<h2 id="article-summary" class="wp-block-heading">Article Summary</h2>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Growth tactics fail when they treat symptoms rather than root causes. This post introduces a three-lens diagnostic method called “Sherlocking” that identifies where a business is actually broken before any strategy gets written. The three lenses are buyer awareness (OATH framework), market positioning (Power Positioning/FAME), and proof stack (FORCEPS). The first 30 to 60 days of any fractional engagement should be almost entirely diagnostic.</p>
</div></div>
<div role="navigation" aria-label="Table of Contents" class="simpletoc wp-block-simpletoc-toc"><h2 class="simpletoc-title">Table of Contents</h2>
<ul class="simpletoc-list">
<li><a href="#article-summary">Article Summary</a>
</li>
<li><a href="#why-most-engagements-fail-before-they-start">Why Most Engagements Fail Before They Start</a>
</li>
<li><a href="#what-i-call-sherlocking">What I Call “Sherlocking”</a>
</li>
<li><a href="#lens-1-is-buyer-awareness">Lens 1 Is Buyer Awareness</a>
</li>
<li><a href="#lens-2-is-market-positioning">Lens 2 Is Market Positioning</a>
</li>
<li><a href="#lens-3-is-the-proof-stack">Lens 3 Is the Proof Stack</a>
</li>
<li><a href="#why-the-diagnosis-changes-everything">Why the Diagnosis Changes Everything</a>
</li>
<li><a href="#what-to-look-for-when-you-hire-strategic-leadership">What to Look for When You Hire Strategic Leadership</a>
</li>
<li><a href="#frequently-asked-questions">Frequently Asked Questions</a>
</li></ul></div>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Every company I walk into has already tried something. They’ve hired an agency. Launched a campaign. Rebuilt the website. Sometimes all three at once, and yet the needle barely moved.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">By the time they call me, they’re not looking for more tactics. They’re looking for someone who can tell them why the tactics didn’t work. That’s the part most people skip. The diagnosis.</p>
<h2 id="why-most-engagements-fail-before-they-start" class="wp-block-heading">Why Most Engagements Fail Before They Start</h2>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I’ve spent over three decades watching this pattern repeat. A company identifies a symptom, like declining leads or flat revenue, and immediately jumps to a solution. New SEO strategy. Rebrand. Paid media blitz.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The problem is that symptoms lie. Declining leads might look like a traffic problem when it’s actually a positioning problem. Flat revenue might look like a sales problem when it’s actually a proof problem. The symptom points you in one direction while the root cause sits somewhere else entirely.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The consultants and agencies who get fired fastest are the ones who accept the client’s self-diagnosis at face value. The ones who last are the ones who push back and say, “Let me look at this myself first.”</p>
<h2 id="what-i-call-sherlocking" class="wp-block-heading">What I Call “Sherlocking”</h2>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Early in my career, someone told me I had a habit of deconstructing problems the way a detective deconstructs a crime scene. I’d pull apart the messaging, the funnel, the competitive landscape, the customer journey, and reassemble the pieces until the real problem surfaced.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I started calling it <a href="https://michelfortin.com/ideal-framework/" data-type="link" data-id="https://michelfortin.com/ideal-framework/">Sherlocking</a>, not because it’s glamorous, but because it captures what the process actually feels like. You’re not guessing. You’re eliminating possibilities until only the truth remains.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Over time, I refined this into a repeatable diagnostic method. Three lenses, applied in sequence, that reveal where a business is actually broken before I write a single word of strategy.</p>
<h2 id="lens-1-is-buyer-awareness" class="wp-block-heading">Lens 1 Is Buyer Awareness</h2>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The first thing I need to know is your buyer’s current state of awareness. This comes from a framework I developed called <a href="/oath-formula/">OATH</a>, which maps buyers into four stages: Oblivious, Apathetic, Thinking, and Hurting.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An Oblivious buyer doesn’t know they have a problem. An Apathetic buyer knows but doesn’t care yet. A Thinking buyer is actively researching solutions. A Hurting buyer needs help now and is ready to act.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most companies write all their content for the Thinking and Hurting stages because that’s where the immediate revenue sits. But when I diagnose a business that’s struggling to grow, I almost always find the same gap. They have nothing for the Oblivious and Apathetic buyers who make up the majority of their addressable market.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This single lens explains why so many content strategies produce traffic but not pipeline. The content exists, but it’s speaking to people who are already close to buying while ignoring everyone else.</p>
<h2 id="lens-2-is-market-positioning" class="wp-block-heading">Lens 2 Is Market Positioning</h2>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The second lens is positioning. I use a framework called <a href="/power-positioning-pillars/">Power Positioning</a> built on four pillars I call FAME: Focus, Aim, Multiply, and Engage.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Focus means narrowing what you do and who you do it for until there’s no confusion. Aim means identifying the specific audience whose problem you solve better than anyone. Multiply means building a content and visibility system that amplifies your focused message. Engage means creating the conversion path that turns visibility into revenue.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When I run this lens across a business, I’m looking for the gap between how they see themselves and how the market sees them. That gap is where most positioning failures live.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A company might describe themselves as a “full-service digital agency” when what they actually do best is B2B demand generation for mid-market SaaS companies. The broader label feels safer, but it makes them invisible to the buyers who would value them most. I see this pattern in at least half the engagements I take on.</p>
<h2 id="lens-3-is-the-proof-stack" class="wp-block-heading">Lens 3 Is the Proof Stack</h2>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The third lens asks a question most companies avoid: Can you actually back up what you’re claiming?</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many clients have told me that “great products sell themselves.” To a degree, this is true. If you have a great product and apply the first two lenses, <a href="https://michelfortin.com/quest-formula/" data-type="post" data-id="632">transitioning the audience into buyers</a> comes easier.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But where many firms stumble is assuming that great products that sell themselves do it by themselves, when they don’t. People talk about them. Tests show they live up to the hype. Guarantees reverse the risk. Clients share their experiences. These are all proof elements. Some are explicit, others not so much.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I use a framework called <a href="/forceps-framework/">FORCEPS</a> to audit seven types of proof: Factual, Optical, Relational, Credential, Evidential, Perceptual, and Social. Each one works differently on different buyers at different awareness stages.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A Thinking buyer needs Factual and Evidential proof, like data, case studies, and third-party validation. A Hurting buyer responds more to Relational and Social proof. They want to know that someone like them solved this exact problem with your help.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When I audit a company’s proof stack, I’m rarely surprised by what I find. Most businesses lean heavily on one or two proof types and neglect the rest. They’ve got testimonials but no case studies. They’ve got data but no narrative around it. They’ve got credentials but never mention them.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The proof gap is usually the easiest to fix and produces the fastest results. It’s also the most commonly ignored because companies assume their work speaks for itself. It doesn’t.</p>
<h2 id="why-the-diagnosis-changes-everything" class="wp-block-heading">Why the Diagnosis Changes Everything</h2>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here’s what happens when you skip straight to tactics. You build a beautiful new website that still has a positioning problem. You launch a content strategy that still targets the wrong awareness stage. You invest in advertising that still lacks proof. The money moves, but the needle doesn’t.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When I walk into a <a href="/fractional-cmo/">fractional CMO</a>, <a href="/fractional-cro/">CRO</a>, or <a href="/fractional-cso/">CSO</a> engagement, the first 30 to 60 days are almost entirely diagnostic. I’m running all three lenses simultaneously, mapping where the gaps are, and building a strategy that addresses root causes instead of symptoms.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That diagnostic phase is where most of the value gets created. Not in the execution that follows, but in the clarity that precedes it.</p>
<h2 id="what-to-look-for-when-you-hire-strategic-leadership" class="wp-block-heading">What to Look for When You Hire Strategic Leadership</h2>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If you’re a senior leader evaluating consultants or a recruiter sourcing fractional executives, here’s the simplest filter I can offer.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ask them what they do in the first 30 days. If the answer is a list of deliverables, keep looking. If the answer is a diagnostic process that starts with questions rather than solutions, you’re probably talking to someone who will actually move the needle.</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The best strategic hires don’t walk in with a playbook. They walk in with a flashlight.</p>
<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>
<h2 id="frequently-asked-questions" class="wp-block-heading">Frequently Asked Questions</h2>
<div class="wp-block-wpseopress-faq-block-v2 is-layout-flow wp-block-wpseopress-faq-block-v2-is-layout-flow">
<details id="what-is-sherlocking-and-why-does-it-matter-before-writing-strategy" class="wp-block-details is-layout-flow wp-block-details-is-layout-flow"><summary><strong>What is “Sherlocking” and why does it matter before writing strategy?</strong></summary>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Sherlocking is the diagnostic process of pulling apart a business’s messaging, funnel, competitive landscape, and customer journey to find where the real problem lives — not just the symptom the company reports. Most tactics fail because they treat the symptom. Sherlocking eliminates possibilities until the root cause surfaces, so strategy addresses the actual breakdown rather than a plausible-looking guess.</p>
</details>
<details id="what-are-the-three-diagnostic-lenses-used-in-a-fractional-engagement" class="wp-block-details is-layout-flow wp-block-details-is-layout-flow"><summary><strong>What are the three diagnostic lenses used in a fractional engagement?</strong></summary>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The three lenses are buyer awareness, market positioning, and the proof stack. Buyer awareness (using the OATH framework) identifies where prospects sit on the spectrum from oblivious to ready-to-buy. Market positioning (using Power Positioning and the FAME pillars) surfaces the gap between how a company sees itself and how the market actually sees it. The proof stack (audited through the FORCEPS framework) tests whether the company can substantiate what it’s claiming to buyers at each awareness stage.</p>
</details>
<details id="why-do-so-many-content-strategies-produce-traffic-but-not-pipeline" class="wp-block-details is-layout-flow wp-block-details-is-layout-flow"><summary><strong>Why do so many content strategies produce traffic but not pipeline?</strong></summary>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Usually because the content is written entirely for buyers who are already close to purchasing — the Thinking and Hurting stages of the OATH framework — while ignoring the Oblivious and Apathetic majority. Those early-stage buyers make up most of the addressable market, but companies skip them because the immediate revenue is elsewhere. Traffic accumulates, but pipeline doesn’t grow because the content isn’t meeting buyers where they actually are.</p>
</details>
<details id="what-is-a-proof-stack-and-why-does-it-matter-for-conversion" class="wp-block-details is-layout-flow wp-block-details-is-layout-flow"><summary><strong>What is a proof stack and why does it matter for conversion?</strong></summary>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A proof stack is the full set of evidence a company uses to validate its claims. The FORCEPS framework audits seven types: Factual, Optical, Relational, Credential, Evidential, Perceptual, and Social. Different proof types work on different buyers — a Thinking buyer needs data and case studies, while a Hurting buyer responds more to social and relational proof. Most companies rely on one or two types and neglect the rest, which leaves a conversion gap that better execution can’t close.</p>
</details>
<details id="what-should-the-first-30-to-60-days-of-a-fractional-executive-engagement-look-like" class="wp-block-details is-layout-flow wp-block-details-is-layout-flow"><summary><strong>What should the first 30 to 60 days of a fractional executive engagement look like?</strong></summary>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Almost entirely diagnostic. Running all three lenses simultaneously — awareness, positioning, and proof — to map where the gaps are before any strategy gets written. That diagnostic phase is where most of the real value gets created. Execution follows clarity; without the diagnosis, you risk building a better version of something that was already aimed in the wrong direction.</p>
</details>
<script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"FAQPage","url":"https://michelfortin.com/diagnostic-advantage/","@id":"https://michelfortin.com/diagnostic-advantage/","mainEntity":[{"@type":"Question","url":"https://michelfortin.com/diagnostic-advantage/#what-is-sherlocking-and-why-does-it-matter-before-writing-strategy","name":"What is \"Sherlocking\" and why does it matter before writing strategy?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"<p>Sherlocking is the diagnostic process of pulling apart a business's messaging, funnel, competitive landscape, and customer journey to find where the real problem lives — not just the symptom the company reports. Most tactics fail because they treat the symptom. Sherlocking eliminates possibilities until the root cause surfaces, so strategy addresses the actual breakdown rather than a plausible-looking guess.</p>"}},{"@type":"Question","url":"https://michelfortin.com/diagnostic-advantage/#what-are-the-three-diagnostic-lenses-used-in-a-fractional-engagement","name":"What are the three diagnostic lenses used in a fractional engagement?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"<p>The three lenses are buyer awareness, market positioning, and the proof stack. Buyer awareness (using the OATH framework) identifies where prospects sit on the spectrum from oblivious to ready-to-buy. Market positioning (using Power Positioning and the FAME pillars) surfaces the gap between how a company sees itself and how the market actually sees it. The proof stack (audited through the FORCEPS framework) tests whether the company can substantiate what it's claiming to buyers at each awareness stage.</p>"}},{"@type":"Question","url":"https://michelfortin.com/diagnostic-advantage/#why-do-so-many-content-strategies-produce-traffic-but-not-pipeline","name":"Why do so many content strategies produce traffic but not pipeline?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"<p>Usually because the content is written entirely for buyers who are already close to purchasing — the Thinking and Hurting stages of the OATH framework — while ignoring the Oblivious and Apathetic majority. Those early-stage buyers make up most of the addressable market, but companies skip them because the immediate revenue is elsewhere. Traffic accumulates, but pipeline doesn't grow because the content isn't meeting buyers where they actually are.</p>"}},{"@type":"Question","url":"https://michelfortin.com/diagnostic-advantage/#what-is-a-proof-stack-and-why-does-it-matter-for-conversion","name":"What is a proof stack and why does it matter for conversion?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"<p>A proof stack is the full set of evidence a company uses to validate its claims. The FORCEPS framework audits seven types: Factual, Optical, Relational, Credential, Evidential, Perceptual, and Social. Different proof types work on different buyers — a Thinking buyer needs data and case studies, while a Hurting buyer responds more to social and relational proof. Most companies rely on one or two types and neglect the rest, which leaves a conversion gap that better execution can't close.</p>"}},{"@type":"Question","url":"https://michelfortin.com/diagnostic-advantage/#what-should-the-first-30-to-60-days-of-a-fractional-executive-engagement-look-like","name":"What should the first 30 to 60 days of a fractional executive engagement look like?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"<p>Almost entirely diagnostic. Running all three lenses simultaneously — awareness, positioning, and proof — to map where the gaps are before any strategy gets written. That diagnostic phase is where most of the real value gets created. Execution follows clarity; without the diagnosis, you risk building a better version of something that was already aimed in the wrong direction.</p>"}}]}</script></div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>